I am pretty sure I could do more in the way of signal boosting PoC's own words rather than coming up with scaled-back, "palatable" messages of my own.
That's a good point. I hadn't though of that (told ya I wasn't that smart). I should definitely think of doing that myself, because it seems like that's a much better solution to the things I'm worried about. After all, the point is them, not us, right?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: (here via a link roundup)
Date: 2009-05-15 12:04 pm (UTC)That's a good point. I hadn't though of that (told ya I wasn't that smart). I should definitely think of doing that myself, because it seems like that's a much better solution to the things I'm worried about. After all, the point is them, not us, right?