<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2010-02-28:480381</id>
  <title>megwrites</title>
  <subtitle>an interesting monster</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>megwrites</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2010-09-26T15:36:13Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="megwrites" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2010-02-28:480381:192205</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/192205.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=192205"/>
    <title>Things that made me smile</title>
    <published>2010-09-26T15:36:13Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-26T15:36:13Z</updated>
    <category term="the road to publication"/>
    <category term="lulz"/>
    <category term="agents"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">I just received a rejection for a query I sent in &lt;i&gt;February&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm caught between being very amused at the eight month gap and slightly bewildered that the agent (or agent's assistant) bothered. Not to downplay that it's a really nice gesture, because it is, it's just that -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a) I think one can assume that after eight months, the agent either was not interested or too busy to take on a new client or both. Which, you know, fair enough. I'm of the school of thought that I'd rather an agent turn me down when their plate is full and concentrate on their clients than try to take me on and have me get lost in the shuffle because they have ten gazillion things to do and people to deal with. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;b) That's time out of someone's day to write (or at least cut-n-paste) and send the email (and probably many others)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So thank you, agent. It wasn't necessary, but it was nice of you. I like your style, and hope we get to work together in the future. If I ever have something that's more up your alley, I'll send it your way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=megwrites&amp;ditemid=192205" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2010-02-28:480381:173173</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/173173.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://megwrites.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=173173"/>
    <title>Yeah, what she said</title>
    <published>2010-03-01T17:17:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-01T17:38:21Z</updated>
    <category term="writing: process"/>
    <category term="links"/>
    <category term="agents"/>
    <dw:mood>awake</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;span style='white-space: nowrap;'&gt;&lt;a href='https://fashionista-35.dreamwidth.org/profile'&gt;&lt;img src='https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png' alt='[personal profile] ' width='17' height='17' style='vertical-align: text-bottom; border: 0; padding-right: 1px;' /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href='https://fashionista-35.dreamwidth.org/'&gt;&lt;b&gt;fashionista_35&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; sums up and says better than I ever could &lt;a href="http://fashionista-35.livejournal.com/544219.html"&gt;every thing I think about the whole "writing rules" meme going around&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As far as I'm concerned (and I said this an entry or two back), there is only one writing rule: WRITE. That's it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I feel about writing the way The Fat Nutritionist does about eating, I suppose. I think any advice or assistance or comments on writing have to start with the premise (and I appropriate from her here): Write. Stuff you like. As much as you want.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Which, for both eating and writing, are radical premises. If you're a writer or a person who pays attention to any health news, you know the world is full of people who want to tell you what to do. Who tell you these things as though you're a complete idiot who can't be trusted on their own to eat or write properly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And while both writers and eaters (ie, everyone who eats food) may need guidance, especially when complex issues get in the way, either health problems or a desire to get published. That's fine. And lots of us have had our internal compasses turned discombobulated or destroyed by concern-trolling and bad advice and authority figures (parents, teachers, mentors) who meant well but thought that we couldn't be trusted on our own to know good from bad and right from wrong. And sometimes to reverse that damage, you do need some guidance. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But remember, there's just one rule: WRITE. Everyone thing else is an opinion or suggestion or strategy or somebody's best educated guess. You take what works, you leave the rest. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is, coincidentally, why there are some agents and editors I have come to love dearly on their blogs. Like agent Holly Root who &lt;a href="http://waxmanagency.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/with-a-boulder-of-salt/"&gt;says wonderful things concerning do's and don'ts that people hand out to writers when it comes to querying and agents&lt;/a&gt;. This, especially:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;So here's what you can take away from the bajillion bytes on the subject: Write the best book you can, then the best query you can. Submit written materials to agents. The worst they can say is no so don't worry about fine-tuning that to the nanometer, just look for the right ballpark (i.e., alive, still in the business). Then press send.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take the rest as it comes. And never, ever let any of the voices on the internet, no matter how helpful or authoritative they aim (or claim) to be, take away from your ability to hear your own unique authorial voice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power of an agent talking to writers (in general and specifically) as though they are adults completely capable of being trusted to do a good job and don't need condescension is mindblowing. I want to draw hearts around these agents, and I'm sad sometimes when they don't rep the kind of books I write. 'cause damn, these are the kind of people that keep me psyched about the idea of getting published and getting to work with such cool folk. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then there are some agents who's advice seems to come with the premise: "Look, I know you (ie, writers) are idiots and I spend my days drowning in your idiocy so I'm gonna tell you what to do because you can't be trusted to know on your own."&lt;br /&gt;I'd name names, because yeah, I have some very specific people in mind who like to dole out this kind of advice and these are agents who I've noticed don't seem to be very happy in their professional lives (I don't know or care about their personal ones). But honestly? I don't want that kind of drama. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suffice it to say, I'm here to sing the praises and spread the gospel of The One Rule. Because there is just one: WRITE. Stuff you like. As much as you want.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=megwrites&amp;ditemid=173173" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
