In case I haven't stated this before
Feb. 18th, 2009 02:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The reason I allow anonymous posting on my LJ is because I realize that not everyone who might come across my little square inch of the internet has a LiveJournal (or Open Access account). Or maybe can't conveniently log their your account. That's fine. I'm not going to make somebody jump through hoops just to leave a quick comment.
But it is nice to sign a name or otherwise identify yourself when you do that. Not asking for your social security or mom's maiden name, just a nom de interwebs if you have it. Something that lets me know that you didn't just come here to hide under a mask of anonymity because you're too chickenshit to stand by the things you say.
I also don't mind people disagreeing with me. I'm often wrong or mistaken about things. Comes with being human. I will do my utmost to be polite about it, so long as I know things are being said in good faith and with some amount of respect.
But disagreeing with me when you're clearly very wrong, in an anonymous comment that you didn't sign? Revokes your right to any politeness, and I will probably be very rude to you and when I'm tired of you, just delete your comment, ban you, and promptly forget your existence.
Seems to me that people who want to say things worth listening to take credit for them. You want to nail your 95 Theses to the church door? Go right on ahead. But either sign them or GTFO.
Thank you, that is all.
I will now resume working on the thing that I'm supposed to be working on rather than farting around on the internet with stupid people.
But it is nice to sign a name or otherwise identify yourself when you do that. Not asking for your social security or mom's maiden name, just a nom de interwebs if you have it. Something that lets me know that you didn't just come here to hide under a mask of anonymity because you're too chickenshit to stand by the things you say.
I also don't mind people disagreeing with me. I'm often wrong or mistaken about things. Comes with being human. I will do my utmost to be polite about it, so long as I know things are being said in good faith and with some amount of respect.
But disagreeing with me when you're clearly very wrong, in an anonymous comment that you didn't sign? Revokes your right to any politeness, and I will probably be very rude to you and when I'm tired of you, just delete your comment, ban you, and promptly forget your existence.
Seems to me that people who want to say things worth listening to take credit for them. You want to nail your 95 Theses to the church door? Go right on ahead. But either sign them or GTFO.
Thank you, that is all.
I will now resume working on the thing that I'm supposed to be working on rather than farting around on the internet with stupid people.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:09 pm (UTC)I would, however, unscreen nasty, brutish, and short comments if they're signed.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:16 pm (UTC)Why is it people treat others they communicate with online so differently from how they treat people in real life?
Do you think it's the anonymity? Because they know they won't get slapped? Do they forget they're talking to human beings?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:23 pm (UTC)I think it comes down to a question that people have asked since long before the Internet: How many people would obey the law if they knew they wouldn't get caught breaking it? The Web's anonymity guarantees--or at least most people assume it does--that no matter how much of an ass you are, you won't get caught. I think it ties in with the same impulse that makes people behave like asses (or dangerously) in traffic--the person getting cut off or nearly sideswiped doesn't know who the driver that almost ran them into another car was.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:33 pm (UTC)usually over political entries
I've never really understood the point of going and saying rude things to someone who has different political views. I get being upset by them. I get ranting about it in your own space. But commenting? Seems pointless because I've never really seen anyone go, "Oh, wow, this anonymous comment has caused me to completely rethink my entire world view!"
I have seen a few people, in rational, polite, civilized discussions say, "You may have a point" or "I didn't think about that" or "Maybe you're right".
The internet will help you grow a thick skin mighty fast, won't it?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:37 pm (UTC)Go be a douchemonkey elsewhere
I think that shall now be my motto and I shall make a sign and hang it over my door, to let all the world know my stance on douchemonkeys.
Also, I LOVE THAT WORD STILL AND I'M SO GLAD YOU INVENTED IT. SO GLAD THAT I AM WRITING IN ALL CAPS. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:16 pm (UTC)Baby, you are on a ROLL, today.
And you happen to be right. Because seriously-- even old Martin signed his name.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 08:42 pm (UTC)Because seriously-- even old Martin signed his name.
Yeah. Very few works, historically or literarily, have been anonymous. There are a few, though most of those are anonymous because the author either faced persecution of the Torture-Maim-Kill kind or because history has forgotten the person's name.
But the really great things said and done in history? Said and done by people who stuck to their guns.
Not to mention that if Martin Luther can risk the ire of the Catholic Church, which basically controlled the governments of Europe at that time, then you can risk a few nasty words to sign your name to a drive by comment, yanno?
I don't get what people are afraid of. Besides being outed as idiots, that is.